| Table of Contents: |
Some high schools might soon need to rethink their policies against cell phone use in the classroom. A researcher at the University of Illinois has developed a low-cost, easy-to-use analytical chemistry instrument that uses students’ cell phones to bring technology to the classroom.
The spectrometer
is one of the most important basic chemistry instruments. The tool shines white
light through a sample solution and allows scientists to determine chemical
makeup depending on how much light is absorbed. The machine is used in most physical
and biological sciences for identifying and quantifying substances.
A standard
spectrometer can cost several hundred dollars, while a high-end machine can
cost thousands. Naturally, most high schools lack the budget to stock many of
these machines. Even when the device is available, it fails to teach students
the underlying properties of chemistry, since they’re likely to just use the
machine and copy down numbers.
Made of simple, low-cost components, the cell phone spectrometer costs under $3 (source: L. Brian Stauffer).
A chemistry professor at the University of Illinois, Alexander Scheeline, has frequently dealt with these problems. “Science is basically about using your senses to see things,” he said in a statement. “It’s just that we’ve got so much technology that now it’s all hidden.”
“The student
gets the impression that a measurement is something that goes on inside a box
and it’s completely inaccessible, not understandable—the purview of expert
engineers,” he said. “That’s not what you want them to learn. In order to get
across the idea, ‘I can do it, and I can see it, and I can understand it,’
they’ve go to build the instrument themselves.”
Setting out to address these issues with spectrometers, Scheeline has designed a low-cost, simple, and open-interface machine. Although he realized that such a spectrometer might not be particularly sensitive or accurate, he saw these shortcomings as educational opportunities.
“If you’re
trying to teach someone an instrument’s limitations, it’s a lot easier to teach
them when they’re blatant than when they’re subtle. Everything goes wrong out
in the open,” he said.

