Home Facebook RSS Newsletter Twitter IBM Ziff Davis Enterprise

GLOBAL CHALLENGES

    Reader Comments

  • POST COMMENT NOW>>
  • Fritz! Fritz? Hello!Posted on: 02-03-10 | By: AnonymousFritz, what planet have you been on for the past decade? It should be obvious by now that part of the challenge of dealing with terrorists is that they are NOT afraid of dying in the process of carrying out a terrorist attack. So why should a swift public execution deter them if they fail to kill themselves while trying to kill others?
  • We have waysPosted on: 01-29-10 | By: fritzterrorists can be stopped dead in their tracks if we really wanted to. Bring back public executions in the courtyard with no death row and appeals to the trial by a Military tribunal. Once the person is judged guilty of terrorism march them out to the wall and carry out the sentence by firing squad. This would speed up the trial as the outcome pretty much is a no brainer (pun intended)
  • Too many people moving through our airpportsPosted on: 01-29-10 | By: AnonymousOne reason the Israeli approach doesn't necessarily translate to other airports in Europe of the US is the sheer volume of people to be screened. Compare the nmber of people going through the El Al lines in Jerusalem with the numbers going through other airlines in New York or Chicago or Paris. It would take FOREVER to travel, and neither the travellers nor the airlines could afford it.
  • Ask El Al airlinesPosted on: 01-27-10 | By: fritzAsk the El Al airlines how they prevent terrorists attacks. they dont use million dollar machines that may or may not work. Plus El Al doesn't hire overpaid U.S. Goverment TSA employees at 25.00+/hour. These people are poorly trained and part of the bureaucracy. History has shown these TSA employees are not any better then the 6.00/hour employees the TSA replaced in the terminals. My desire to fly anywhere has been reduced to less then zero and I feel sorry for the passengers that endure these new policies that will now work.
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 01-26-10 | By: jayProbably a bit of excess snake oil here. Voice analysis, automated lie detection have NOT proven themselves in proper double blind testing (even though they have plenty of 'true believers' even in government agencies). The testing (where there is some) is generally under the design and control of the manufacturers, frequently citing 'proprietary reasons' for failing to allow it to be exhaustively tested by critical testers. Even the classic lie detector (where the interviewer has much more time and access than at an airport) has proven largely useless. The 'puffer' is the only item on the list that is at all scientifically credible, though it does produce a significant number of false positives (recently busting a guy for carrying jars of fresh honey in his luggage. The funny thing is, the TSA inspectors, before the honey was identified, managed to get 'sick' and had to be treated at the hospital)
  • We're Too SensitivePosted on: 01-25-10 | By: Bobby TAmerica will never have ultra safe security because we're more concerned with offending people than we are in protecting them. We don't have the will and desire to ensure that airplanes are safe. Now that we have incredible technology, such as body scanners, people are worried more about privacy rights than they are about catching terrorists. What's more important, catching a terrorist before boarding a plane or embarrassing someone? When are we going to wake up and realize we're at war with some warped, devious minds and we have to act as if passenger protection is critical.
  • 1 Step Solution to Stop Airline TerroristsPosted on: 01-25-10 | By: kekulejr.Everyone should fly naked! Or perhaps with a thong.