Home Facebook RSS Newsletter Twitter IBM Ziff Davis Enterprise

TECHNOLOGY FOR CHANGE

    Reader Comments

  • POST COMMENT NOW>>
  • How can you be part of the Study?Posted on: 07-09-10 | By: Alice NeufeldMy husband suffered retinal detachments. I know he would be willing to be a recipient in order to advance the study. He has already lost his vision - so it cannot get worse. What a breakthrough!!!!
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 07-06-10 | By: diana whiteHow do I get in touch with the ones that are experimenting with the artificial retina. My husband has retinitis pigmentosa and is interested in volunteering.
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 04-25-10 | By: Anonymousone of the comment say "who cares..." this person is blessed with every thing in the life and also so sure about future...... does not have idea if some one does not have vision... this new research will sure give sight to my son....
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 02-23-10 | By: Anonymous" My guess is that NIH either lacks vision..." excellent choice of words. This article's information is very exciting!
  • Re: Retinal ImplantsPosted on: 02-23-10 | By: John AhernI wish the article included graphics to enable the reader to understand the full system and implant locations.
  • Re:Cone Rod DystrophyPosted on: 02-20-10 | By: FredFrom my reading of the article, the answer is (probably) yes. I believe that CRD doesn't affect the optic nerve. This is similar to AMD and Retinitis Pigmentosa, which the implant is targeted to help. Meanwhile, it seems that part of the problem behind CRD is lipofuscin buildup. Lipofuscin is a broad class of fatty deposits that include, among other things, age spots on the skin. There is a Chinese herb that MAY be of help: Fo Ti. A couple of studies have shown it to reduce the accumulation of lipofuscin. Antioxidants may also help. Best of luck.
  • Not sure, but...Posted on: 02-20-10 | By: FredThe Department of Energy was also the funding source for the Human Genome Project after NIH turned it down. My guess is that NIH either lacks vision (sorry...) or sufficient funds.