Home Facebook RSS Newsletter Twitter IBM Ziff Davis Enterprise

TECHNOLOGY FOR CHANGE

    Reader Comments

  • POST COMMENT NOW>>
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 02-17-10 | By: AnonymousThis has even greater potential for hackers and identity thieves than traditional RFID and other techniques used in government issued IDs that are already failing the test. Maybe we could implant it in the brain to track criminals and other potential troublemakers, or just wire everybody just in case, next time there is a national security concern, which would be the perfect excuse to make sure the masses won't complain about invasion of privacy...
  • The laws of PhysicsPosted on: 02-07-10 | By: Steve StecklerTo couple more energy into the air generally requires more area. What's the secret?
  • Perpetual Motion?Posted on: 02-07-10 | By: AnonymousI'd like to hear some more details. Sounds like perpetual motion! Doesn't more radiation coupling require more area?
  • Increases Output Energy DensityPosted on: 02-04-10 | By: Allan GillardThe thought occurs to me that if we are shrinking the antenna emitter (and collector) by a factor of 50, while still requiring the same energy output to generate signal strength and hence achieve the same coverage, what has to change is that the energy density produced at the antenna has to dramatically increase. The problem with increasing the output energy density that is being radiated from the antenna is that it would induce even higher temperatures in surrounding materials - i.e. what is supposedly a potential cause of brain cancer due to where people position their phones while making calls. While the current research into this area has generated conflicting results as to the actual effects of mobile phone antenna radiation, such a large increase in output energy density would have the risk of producing even more substantial effects. Of course, the fact that the antenna is able to be reduced does mean that it is more sensitive to sending and receiving signals, and so signal strengths and hence the energy outputs could possibly be reduced while achieving the same connectivity. One area where I see this may lead in terms of future benefits is around the integration with RFID tag technologies, enabling more distant detection and tracking of objects.
  • Receiving antennasPosted on: 02-04-10 | By: B GrisdaleYour article refers only to transmitting antennas. What results are available for receiving antennas? Thanks!
  • Dennis.Mize@bcbsks.comPosted on: 02-04-10 | By: Dennis MizeThe digital TV arena that we now live makes it difficult for me to get a signal from my local station. When I'm at work, and have no access to cable TV, I used to be able to listen to sports game over my protable TV. Now, even with a digital portable and a powered HDTV antenna, I can't get the CBS affiliate that have most of the sports that I interested in getting. Maybe they could use this technology to produce more sensitive antennas with greater ranges. The smaller size might help, since I can't put a roof-top antenna in my cubicle at work!!
  • Possible Z-Antenna UsesPosted on: 02-04-10 | By: David MargulisThe z-antennas would enable radar on GA aircraft and automobiles allowing for much improved active collision avoidance. There are also some fairly obvious offensive and defensive military applications (e.g. autonomous targeting of moving objects, tunnel and hidey-hole detection). Also, if I understood correctly that the antenna was dynamically tunable, the reduction in the number of required antennas would easily allow for multi-band communications on portable devices. And finally, they would aid in the possible use of lower frequencies in devices thereby extending their range, assuming the power requirement can be dealt with.