Home Facebook RSS Newsletter Twitter IBM Ziff Davis Enterprise

TECHNOLOGY FOR CHANGE

    Reader Comments

  • POST COMMENT NOW>>
  • Neutrality Is Equal AccessPosted on: 05-28-10 | By: Bob GreeneThose pondering the issue of equal access to the internet-- an internet system developed by taxpayers and released, gratis, to private industry for its own profit-- must recognize the internet remains a public asset and public commodity. Private operators such as AT&T may add to the internet system, just as private contractors can erect toll roads and bridges. But they do not "own" their tollbooth, but use it under public license to recover profit from their investment. In general terms, this opportunity to profit from investment is similar to the copyright granted to an author or a patent. It is not a right granted in perpetuity, but a recognition of the creator's investment and an opportunity to realize a profit. To encourage private investment, government made it profitable for corporations like AT&T to be civic-minded, and invest in system expansion. Under the Universal Service Act (1936), and amendments (including 1996), corporations like AT&T were to enjoy a limited-duration tariff as a public subsidy to AT&T and others to develop service for under-served regions of this country. However, these corporations made so much money from the tariff, they persuaded congress the program should continue indefinitely. Meanwhile, the national telecommunications infrastructure that AT&T and others were being paid to develop lagged wretchedly behind places like South Korea and countries of the EU. Broadband took off in Korea, Malaysia and Taiwan, while Americans were told it would be years before fiber became affordable to most households. It now seems AT&T and other telecomms had enjoyed making money hand-over-fist so much, they "forgot" about the purpose of the tariff. AT&T and Verizon, in particular, enjoyed a very close relationship with Sen. McCain, and McCain made sure the regulated felt no pain. Only after the election of 2008, the FCC-- its chairman appointed by Obama-- finally recovered a detectable pulse of interest in fulfilling its public mission. It is encumbent on the rest of us consumers to remind the FCC of years of missed opportunity and mission failure, and encourage a policy of (1) internet neutrality and (2) further expansion of public-facing networks and services at lowest possible prices.