Home Facebook RSS Newsletter Twitter IBM Ziff Davis Enterprise

TECHNOLOGY FOR CHANGE

    Reader Comments

  • POST COMMENT NOW>>
  • License agreement adds permissionPosted on: 10-23-09 | By: R. Colin JohnsonThose long license agreements that nobody reads could be amended to include permission to send your info back to the vendor, but wait--the pirate doesn't sign-off on the license agreement. I don't suspect that pirates will be claiming their privacy has been invaded, since they won't want to admit they illegally copied the software, so the only ones with valid complaints will be those who have legal copies, but were mistakenly targeted as pirates--however, those individuals will have signed the license agreement. Not a Catch-22, but close to it.
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 10-20-09 | By: james pshould inform user that this type of Trojan horse is being used on there computer smacks of illegal search & seizure of personal information without a warrant even cops have to get a warrant to do something like this why can a private company do it without one
  • Pirates only hack the licensing authenticationPosted on: 10-20-09 | By: R. Colin JohnsonV.i. Labs claims the method used to hide CodeArmor inside a program is not the same in every application the way licensing authentication tends to be. Also the pirates that [i]liberate[/i] expensive software packages are just interested in proving that it can be done. They don't actually [i]use[/i] the applications, and thus don't encounter the challenge of rooting out the stealth routines of CodeArmor.
  • Watch for exploits on thisPosted on: 10-19-09 | By: TedWatch for exploits on this. Nice idea for software vendors until such time hackers figure a way to pipe customer's sensitive data through it. Best to either lock down CodeArmor's ports or find a new vendor that doesn't use it.
  • Is this a privacy intrusion?Posted on: 10-19-09 | By: AnonymousSound like a Trojan Horse, lying dormant inside an application until you start using it, then sending your personal information to software vendors if you don't have a license. Will this really stem piracy, or is this just another intrusion on our privacy?