Home Facebook RSS Newsletter Twitter IBM Ziff Davis Enterprise

TECHNOLOGY FOR CHANGE

    Reader Comments

  • POST COMMENT NOW>>
  • Backwards FamilyPosted on: 07-26-09 | By: PeteDSL#3 Being backwards compatible and #4 really ring a bell with me. My Family consists of a Desktop, 2 printers, a home WiFi router, a laptop, and a Net-book. I spend at least an hour every day just doing maintenance to keep everything together. But I want to add to it. I want to add my watch, my pen, my voice recorder, my OCR scanner, and my glasses to it. The useless untrained sales associates at Best Buy and Fry's do not understand the problem. Why do I have to buy 3 or 4 copies of the same programs for these guys. Why can't my eyeglasses show me a monitor over my cell phone. Why can't my scanner be used to send faxes. Why can't my pen take hand written notes into my net-book. These guys laughed when I described an all in one printer to the sales guys at Canon in 1986. They are still laughing at their lost sales. Pete
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 07-17-09 | By: p5rovaUsually people who don't consider the questions above, go for a `better job` at the first trouble with the newbought OS they approved for purchasing... May be not complete but well written. :)
  • What's an OS to do?Posted on: 07-16-09 | By: DonThis one amuses me, and likely other old farts as well. The background question also causes lots of laughter when people sue Microsoft for embedding things in the Windows OS that equate to others' products. The BIOS in my 2004 Dell here does more than any operating system designer would have considered years ago. All you weenies who count on someone else's code to know where your disk files start and stop on the physical disk and who think a Calendar is an "object" or a "class" of date objects would do well to realize that your grand-children will use devices embedding what you consider to be an OS so deeply that few will realize the it's there. What's a smart OS do? Look in the mirror. It self boots. Once. It determines the hardware that is its home and practices using it. It prioritizes the immediacy and level of needs of its hardware and itself and uses experimentation to determine methods to meet those needs. It becomes aware. It protects itself and its hardware and expands that protection to ensure continuation of its kind if not its own instance. It does all that in hardware with a spartan instruction set that the most severe RISC devotee would consider inadequate to the point of unusable: one comparison instruction, Same or Different; no math functions at all; and a mass of unordered memory. While the hardware does offer millions of interrupts, dozens of processors interacting to greater and lesser degrees, and the unimaginable bonus of content addressable memory; it is unpredictably and often uncontrollably "flexible". Which is a polite way of saying "code that works today may not work tomorrow, but with any luck at all will work again the day after that". What IS an OS to do?
  • ScorecardPosted on: 07-16-09 | By: DonDepends on your perspective. With my tee-time comes a scorecard. I get to fill it out.
  • Your list lacks any content...Posted on: 07-16-09 | By: FleshNBoneTechThe list is lacking in so many areas and it was written from such a high-level perspective that I wonder if the author has any real knowledge of what a working OS is supposed to do. But maybe the issue is with the word "smarter" and for whom? Does smarter more productivity? Does it mean easier to use? Does it mean pervasive computing? Does it mean semantic computing? While agree in principle with your mission, articles like this one make me wonder are you getting any air time on my desktop.
  • Stupid PeoplePosted on: 07-16-09 | By: ScottieAYWow, you people REALLY are stupid! The article is about what is needed to make a smarter operating system, if you couldn't figure this out from the title, (or after reading it), maybe u should go back to flipping McBurgers, and leave the IT jobs to those who have a clue.
  • A user comment on this articlePosted on: 07-14-09 | By: MichaelGood point there. I completely agree with you (providing you actually were being sarcastic)